Post by account_disabled on Mar 10, 2024 1:07:30 GMT -5
Court of Justice: the Non-Limitation of Financial Institutions to the % Interest of Paragraph of Article of the Constitution, Revoked by the Constitutional Amendment / in the Decision, Which Partially Upheld The. Appeal Filed by the Credit Card Administrator, the Judges Also Dealt with the Reimbursement of Excess Amounts Charged by the Administrator to the Customer. as the Company's Bad Faith Was Not Proven, the Refund of Amounts Was Simple, and Not Double, as It Would Be If There Had Been the Intention of Penalizing It. Judge Carlos Henrique Abrão, Member of the Court's Th Private Law Chamber, Believes That with the Decision, New Actions Will Arise Against Credit Card Administrators for Interest Capitalization.
Supreme Court Rejects Roberto Jefferson's Appeal
the Federal Supreme Court Rejected Themotion for Clarification Filed by the Former Federal Deputy and President of the Ptb, Roberto Jefferson, Against the Stf's Own Decision That Denied the Fifth Question of Order in the Action, Raised by the Former Deputy's Lawyer. Minister-Rapporteur Joaquim Barbosa Stated That the Case Is a Clear Maneuver to Delay the Progress of the Action. According to the Austria Phone Numbers List Minister, This Is the Eleventh Time That Roberto Jefferson Has Appealed the Same Decisions with the Same Allegations. the Plenary Decided That All Appeals Filed Against the Rapporteur's Decisions Must Be Brought Briefly to the Plenary, Which Will Reject Them If They Continue to Use the Same Arguments and Are Untimely or Present Other Defects.
in the Criminal Action, People Are Accused of Involvement in a Vote-Buying Scheme for Parliamentarians to Vote in Favor of Projects of Interest to the Government in Congress. in the Appeal, Roberto Jefferson's Defense Insisted on Questions About the Process, Alleging That There Were Omissions and Contradictions by the Court in the Case. Disagreements Minister Joaquim Barbosa Refuted All the Defense's Arguments, Which He Had Already Done in the Plenary Trial on April , One of the Points Alleged by the Former Deputy Is the Refusal to Include Former President Luiz Inácio Lula Da Silva as Defendant in the Action, Although the Request Was Rejected by the Plenary on June , the Defense Also Claimed the Nullity of the Process Since the Interrogation Was Carried Out in Recife and Brasília, at the End of , Without the Presence of Roberto Jefferson. According to Joaquim Barbosa, the Hearings Were Coordinated by His Office in Order to Give the Co-Defendants' Lawyers the Opportunity to Witness Them.
Supreme Court Rejects Roberto Jefferson's Appeal
the Federal Supreme Court Rejected Themotion for Clarification Filed by the Former Federal Deputy and President of the Ptb, Roberto Jefferson, Against the Stf's Own Decision That Denied the Fifth Question of Order in the Action, Raised by the Former Deputy's Lawyer. Minister-Rapporteur Joaquim Barbosa Stated That the Case Is a Clear Maneuver to Delay the Progress of the Action. According to the Austria Phone Numbers List Minister, This Is the Eleventh Time That Roberto Jefferson Has Appealed the Same Decisions with the Same Allegations. the Plenary Decided That All Appeals Filed Against the Rapporteur's Decisions Must Be Brought Briefly to the Plenary, Which Will Reject Them If They Continue to Use the Same Arguments and Are Untimely or Present Other Defects.
in the Criminal Action, People Are Accused of Involvement in a Vote-Buying Scheme for Parliamentarians to Vote in Favor of Projects of Interest to the Government in Congress. in the Appeal, Roberto Jefferson's Defense Insisted on Questions About the Process, Alleging That There Were Omissions and Contradictions by the Court in the Case. Disagreements Minister Joaquim Barbosa Refuted All the Defense's Arguments, Which He Had Already Done in the Plenary Trial on April , One of the Points Alleged by the Former Deputy Is the Refusal to Include Former President Luiz Inácio Lula Da Silva as Defendant in the Action, Although the Request Was Rejected by the Plenary on June , the Defense Also Claimed the Nullity of the Process Since the Interrogation Was Carried Out in Recife and Brasília, at the End of , Without the Presence of Roberto Jefferson. According to Joaquim Barbosa, the Hearings Were Coordinated by His Office in Order to Give the Co-Defendants' Lawyers the Opportunity to Witness Them.